[cdp] extend-freeze versus just freeze?

[Peter P.]

Hi Archer,

and thanks for the reply. Would it be best practice to deprecate the
FREEZE binary then (it is also not listed in the html docs)? I would
file a github issue then.

cheers, P

* Archer Endrich <archerhgm at gmail.com> [2020-04-08 14:29]:
> Dear Peter,
> 
> Thanks for your query.  I believe the functionality of these two versions of
> FREEZE is identical, but EXTEND FREEZE is the newer version, while FREEZE is
> the previous version and should be deprecated.  You will note a slight
> difference in the naming of the parameters, esp. 'pscat' becomes 'pshift'
> and the start and end times are named more helpfully in the newer version.
> 
> If any other CDP experts think differently, please let us know.
> 
> Cheers,
> Archer  - CDP
> 
> On 08/04/2020 11:27, Peter P. wrote:
> > Hi list,
> > 
> > hope everyone is fine!
> > 
> > I just found out that the current cdp from git contains a freeze
> > binary, whose function seems identical to extend-freeze. Is this
> > intentional?
> >