[Grml] Re: boring
Michael Gebetsroither
gebi at sbox.tugraz.at
Fri Dec 8 15:49:12 CET 2006
Quoting Mark <27e3kk302 at sneakemail.com>:
> OK, er, I do embedded work, and know what RT means. I only suggested an
> obvious kernel change as one idea.
There may also a speed increase up to the numbers of CPU's, because
the new kernel is SMP enabled.
Additionally i think the new gcc also does his part.
> The general claim that RT makes systems slower is hogwash.
1. Why?
2. Hard rt systems have nothing to do with execution speed, right?
They _have to_ met their realtime constraints otherwise peoples live
are at risk.
> A good RT
> system will distribute CPU cycles optimally with or without RT
> constraints.
How could a RT System distribute the cpu cycles optimally?
Does a RT system really distribute cpu cycles?
> Anyway the person asking has a faster system now. Sure
> that could result from someplace else, who knows.
time to guess ;)
greets,
michael
More information about the Grml
mailing list