+comunity+ Infinite Justice (1): Hackers are Terrorists (fwd)
f,
ft at mur.at
Di Sep 25 12:28:45 CEST 2001
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#
"It's important for us to explain to our nation that life is important.
It's not only life of babies, but it's life of children living in, you
know, the dark dungeons of the Internet."
George W. Bush
+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+#+
public pgp key @ http://fox.mur.at/~ft/pubkey.html
- ---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 03:45:43 +0200
From: sebastian at rolux.org
To: nettime-l at bbs.thing.net
Subject: <nettime> Infinite Justice (1): Hackers are Terrorists
SecurityFocus
Hackers face life imprisonment under 'Anti-Terrorism' Act
Justice Department proposal classifies most computer crimes as
acts of terrorism.
By Kevin Poulsen
Sep 23 2001 11:00PM PT
Hackers, virus-writers and web site defacers would face life
imprisonment without the possibility of parole under legislation
proposed by the Bush Administration that would classify most
computer crimes as acts of terrorism.
The Justice Department is urging Congress to quickly approve its
Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA), a twenty-five page proposal that would
expand the government's legal powers to conduct electronic
surveillance, access business records, and detain suspected
terrorists.
The proposal defines a list of "Federal terrorism offenses" that
are subject to special treatment under law. The offenses include
assassination of public officials, violence at international
airports, some bombings and homicides, and politically-motivated
manslaughter or torture.
Most of the terrorism offenses are violent crimes, or crimes
involving chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons. But the list
also includes the provisions of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
that make it illegal to crack a computer for the purpose of
obtaining anything of value, or to deliberately cause damage.
Likewise, launching a malicious program that harms a system,
like a virus, or making an extortionate threat to damage a
computer are included in the definition of terrorism.
To date no terrorists are known to have violated the Computer
Fraud and Abuse Act. But several recent hacker cases would have
qualified as "Federal terrorism offenses" under the Justice
Department proposal, including the conviction of Patrick
Gregory, a prolific web site defacer who called himself
"MostHateD"; Kevin Mitnick, who plead guilty to penetrating
corporate networks and downloading proprietary software;
Jonathan "Gatsby" Bosanac, who received 18-months in custody for
cracking telephone company computers; and Eric Burns, the
Shoreline, Washington hacker who scrawled "Crystal, I love you"
on a United States Information Agency web site in 1999. The 19-
year-old was reportedly trying to impress a classmate with whom
he was infatuated.
The Justice Department submitted the ATA to Congress late last
week as a response to the September 11th terrorist attacks in
New York, Washington and Pennsylvania that killed some 7,000
people.
As a "Federal terrorism offense," the five year statute of
limitations for hacking would be abolished retroactively --
allowing computer crimes committed decades ago to be prosecuted
today -- and the maximum prison term for a single conviction
would be upped to life imprisonment. There is no parole in the
federal justice system
Those convicted of providing "advice or assistance" to cyber
crooks, or harboring or concealing a computer intruder, would
face the same legal repercussions as an intruder. Computer
intrusion would also become a predicate offense for the RICO
statutes.
DNA samples would be collected from hackers upon conviction, and
retroactively from those currently in custody or under federal
supervision. The samples would go into the federal database that
currently catalogs murderers and kidnappers.
Civil liberties groups have criticized the ATA for its dramatic
expansion of surveillance authority, and other law enforcement
powers.
But Attorney General John Ashcroft urged swift adoption of the
measure Monday.
Testifying before the House Judiciary Committee, Ashcroft
defended the proposal's definition of terrorism. "I don't
believe that our definition of terrorism is so broad," said
Ashcroft. "It is broad enough to include things like assaults on
computers, and assaults designed to change the purpose of
government."
The Act is scheduled for mark-up by the committee Tuesday
morning.
http://www.securityfocus.com/news/257
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine
iD8DBQE7sFxi2zcoyglD/6sRAit9AJ9wujmXrXhjF35UbMWwX3H+XBz50gCfTlsK
nzjn7Q2D/ixQYVBD7eQN2NM=
=SyPf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Mehr Informationen über die Mailingliste comunity