Network booting, Terminal Server or PXE

Hi Mika,
Just out of curiosity, how do you compare Terminal Server and PXE?
I knew the term "Terminal Server" when I knew grml, and only within the grml community. The outside world seems to be interested in PXE instead. So I like to know the reason behind why grml chose Terminal Server over PXE.
Here are the homeworks I've done:
The only "Terminal Server" I found on the web seems to related with KNOPPIX http://knoppix.manty.net/ http://www.knoppix.net/wiki/KNOPPIX_Terminal_Server
But the original author of the wiki document, Rjent, has moved his efforts to working on something else.
PXE is backed by Intel and is part of Intels(tm) Wired for Management (WfM) http://www.knoppix.net/wiki/PXE_FAQ
The Linux Magazine has written a good article about 'Network Booting' http://www.linux-mag.com/id/1179
Tim Kientzle Tuesday, October 15th, 2002
in which Tim recommended PXE.
Thanks
PS. For those PC that has Network booting built-in capability in ROM, are they booting PXE or Terminal Server or something else?
PPS. The reason that I'm asking, its very easy to test PXE booting in KVM...

* T o n g mlist4suntong@yahoo.com [20090724 17:49]:
Just out of curiosity, how do you compare Terminal Server and PXE?
I knew the term "Terminal Server" when I knew grml, and only within the grml community. The outside world seems to be interested in PXE instead. So I like to know the reason behind why grml chose Terminal Server over PXE.
Here are the homeworks I've done:
The only "Terminal Server" I found on the web seems to related with KNOPPIX http://knoppix.manty.net/ http://www.knoppix.net/wiki/KNOPPIX_Terminal_Server
[...]
That's exactly where it derives from. We decided to use the same Knoppix slang/wording so users can move from Knoppix to grml as simple/easy/fast as possible.
I'm aware that it's not 100% accurate though I don't see any way how to rename it without confusing our users nowadays. ;)
regards, -mika-

T o n g wrote: Hi Tong,
Just out of curiosity, how do you compare Terminal Server and PXE?
Terminal Server is the project to boot GRML over network. PXE is the used technology to get the kernel/initrd running on the other host (PXE == pre boot execution environment).
I knew the term "Terminal Server" when I knew grml, and only within the grml community. The outside world seems to be interested in PXE instead. So I like to know the reason behind why grml chose Terminal Server over PXE.
Every terminalserver projekt out there uses PXE as the underlying technology to boot over the network.
Here are the homeworks I've done:
The only "Terminal Server" I found on the web seems to related with KNOPPIX http://knoppix.manty.net/ http://www.knoppix.net/wiki/KNOPPIX_Terminal_Server
But the original author of the wiki document, Rjent, has moved his efforts to working on something else.
PXE is backed by Intel and is part of Intels(tm) Wired for Management (WfM) http://www.knoppix.net/wiki/PXE_FAQ
The Linux Magazine has written a good article about 'Network Booting' http://www.linux-mag.com/id/1179
Tim Kientzle Tuesday, October 15th, 2002
in which Tim recommended PXE.
Thanks
PS. For those PC that has Network booting built-in capability in ROM, are they booting PXE or Terminal Server or something else?
PPS. The reason that I'm asking, its very easy to test PXE booting in KVM...
The most prominent Terminalserver projekt with linux is LTSP (linux terminalserver project, http://www.ltsp.org/)
And thats where all similar projects got there name from, afaik.
michael
Teilnehmer (3)
-
Michael Gebetsroither
-
Michael Prokop
-
T o n g