Hi I found the page that generates daily builds of unstable and stable grml, I notice that iso size can be exactly the same for 3 or 4 consecutive days so I suppose nothing was changed or added to the iso in those days, is this correct?. I might be wrong but I don't think there are devs coding new things or modifying old ones every single day. I suppose that the app which generates the daily isos do it automatically and it doesn't matter if something new was added or not, modified or not, it simply keeps doing daily isos non stop, correct?. Thanks in advance for any info.
Hi,
On 08/25/2014 08:43 PM, Carlos Carlos wrote:
I found the page that generates daily builds of unstable and stable grml, I notice that iso size can be exactly the same for 3 or 4 consecutive days so I suppose nothing was changed or added to the iso in those days, is this correct?. I might be wrong but I don't think there are devs coding new things or modifying old ones every single day.
It is true that the iso size can be the same on different builds but you should check the provided md5 or sha1 file to find out if there has been any changes. E.g. the iso in [1] and [2] have the same size but different checksums:
[1] http://daily.grml.org/grml64-full_testing/2014-08-19_04-25-09/ [2] http://daily.grml.org/grml64-full_testing/2014-08-20_04-25-13/
I suppose that the app which generates the daily isos do it automatically and it doesn't matter if something new was added or not, modified or not, it simply keeps doing daily isos non stop, correct?. Thanks in advance for any info.
The build is controlled by the Jenkins "Continous Integration Lab":
And yes, there seem to be changes nearly every day. And take into account that grml (testing and sid) are based on Debian testing resp. sid and daily changes are very, very likely. ;)
I am not a grml-developer so I don't know the details of the internals of the build process so take my word with a grain of salt but I am pretty sure that the ISOs only get build when a source packages has been modified.. (@grml-team: please correct me if I am wrong).
HTH && HAND, - Darsha
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 03:56:00PM +0200, Darshaka Pathirana wrote:
It is true that the iso size can be the same on different builds but you should check the provided md5 or sha1 file to find out if there has been any changes. E.g. the iso in [1] and [2] have the same size but different checksums:
[1] http://daily.grml.org/grml64-full_testing/2014-08-19_04-25-09/ [2] http://daily.grml.org/grml64-full_testing/2014-08-20_04-25-13/
As the daily builds contain the build date in the version string, all builds will have a different checksum... :) You'll have to compare the packages used to build the ISOs to be sure it's the same.
Greets Evgeni
On 08/27/2014 06:23 PM, Evgeni Golov wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 03:56:00PM +0200, Darshaka Pathirana wrote:
It is true that the iso size can be the same on different builds but you should check the provided md5 or sha1 file to find out if there has been any changes. E.g. the iso in [1] and [2] have the same size but different checksums:
[1] http://daily.grml.org/grml64-full_testing/2014-08-19_04-25-09/ [2] http://daily.grml.org/grml64-full_testing/2014-08-20_04-25-13/
As the daily builds contain the build date in the version string, all builds will have a different checksum... :)
Good point... ;)
Teilnehmer (3)
-
Carlos Carlos -
Darshaka Pathirana -
Evgeni Golov