Incoming from Frank Terbeck:
Mark 27e3kk302@sneakemail.com:
DD(?):
As a DD, I have to violently disagree with these three "translations".
...which is one reason we use grml. Choice is good.
Choice is good. Agreed. Yet, choice does not increase the truth of your claims.
I agree. I thought the "buggy" characterization was reversed. Stable's the least buggy. It may be old, but that's good if you're demanding stability, which is what Debian's always been about. It's not buggy. It's had years of bug reports from thousands of users folded back into it since it was considered (at that time) testing.
I look at things like grml as terrific features on top of Debian and free software. grml's on the frontlines in the war on bugs. They're just a little bit more careful than Sid people about when they stick their heads up. They're also confident that even "unstable" Debian/Linux/FS is way usable, and can perform some pretty awesome tricks. I think that's pretty cool.
To the DD who took exception here, feh, he's just a kid who doesn't know what he's talking about. Educate him (the kid, not the DD :-).