
20 Sep
2007
20 Sep
'07
12:44
Am Monday 17 September 2007 schrieb Michael Prokop:
So what's *your* opinion about "grml-small grows to ~125MB"? I highly appreciate any feedback.
For me grml-small never had to fit on some small storage.
Don't get me wrong, i want it to be small. But it's not exactely the size that counts for me, at least not like "it has to fit on <insert storage device>", but rather "it provides basic features, but not more"
So i'd say: allow it to grow slightly when needed, maybe eaven sacrifice a MB here and there if it makes maintainance easier, but don't add bloat just to fill it up to some new defined size limit.
Worf