If you wish to use GRML as a hard disk system, what happens if you attempt to use stable Debian packages to avoid breaking things? Why Apache and stuff is included on a Debian-unstable system is beyond me. Especially because the software should not be included in the first place. People may get the idea that servers can be ran on grml! For a blind user that has discovered GRML, the user may go running programs/services never intended for use on GRML! What do you all think of this? I have read the Debian unstable FAQ, and the answer in that document is "Are you insaine? No!" To the question about "Should I run Debian-Sid on my server?" GRML includes Speakup accessibility, wich I require in my Linux kernels; and often don't have time to compile a Linux kernel, therefore I use GRML. Would I be better off installing a plain Debian system rather than GRML perhaps on my laptop When I get back in the next few weeks to set it up? Thanks!
GRML is rather cool, but the fact that you folks have included services on it at all is a bit..concerning. What if grep or something was to break on GRML? Considering that you're based on the Sid branch. How about security related updates (wich are not provided for Debian-unstable packages) in the first place for users installing GRML directly to hard-drive? Despite GRML being an extremely cool Linux system, it is still based off Sid!
Regards, --Keith