<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Here are my idea to improve grml even more!<br>
<br>
1 Base it on testing (etch)<br>
Forget about unstable. There are enough distro's out there that are
based on debian unstable. I found them all extremely volatile. You
never knew what happens next after a dist-upgrade. Debian Etch on the
other is up to date and without much problems. Another benefit from
switching to Etch would that the developers have more time on their
hand to focus on grml instead of fixing the errors in the unstable
branch. And grml would also stand out more in the excessive amount of
debian distro's available. So I say remove all unstable repositories! <span
class="moz-smiley-s3"><span> ;-) </span></span>Users who really
want could add them themselves but <u>i think that debian etch shoul
be default.<br>
<br>
</u>2 Add an option to install grub instead of lilo with grml2hd.<br>
<br>
3 Less windowmanagers please<br>
Grml comes with a whole array of windowmanager most of which are in my
opion not good enough. I think it will provide more clarity if the
amount of windowmanger would be largely decreased. You seem focused on
fluxbox and I would choose to make that one the default. Thanks to the
debian apt-get system the other windowsmanagers are just an apt-get
install away. You could make an oversight in the grml wiki of the
available windowmanagers and their pro and cons.<br>
<br>
I hope this information is helpfull in making grml a better product.
Good luck!<br>
</body>
</html>